Target: NAT2 Reasearch on rifapentine

DISEASE TARGET DRUG TARGET-DRUG RELATIONSHIP

Year Title Journal Abstract
2021Pharmacogenetic interactions of rifapentine plus isoniazid with efavirenz or nevirapine.Pharmacogenet GenomicsThe effect of rifapentine plus isoniazid on efavirenz pharmacokinetics was characterized in AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol A5279 (NCT01404312). The present analyses characterize pharmacogenetic interactions between these drugs, and with nevirapine.A subset of HIV-positive individuals receiving efavirenz- or nevirapine-containing antiretroviral therapy in A5279 underwent pharmacokinetic evaluations at baseline, and again weeks 2 and 4 after initiating daily rifapentine plus isoniazid. Associations with polymorphisms relevant to efavirenz, nevirapine, isoniazid, and rifapentine pharmacokinetics were assessed.Of 128 participants, 101 were evaluable for associations with rifapentine and its active 25-desacetyl metabolite, 87 with efavirenz, and 38 with nevirapine. In multivariable analyses, NAT2 slow acetylators had greater week 4 plasma concentrations of rifapentine (P = 2.6 × 10) and 25-desacetyl rifapentine (P = 7.0 × 10) among all participants, and in efavirenz and nevirapine subgroups. NAT2 slow acetylators also had greater plasma efavirenz and nevirapine concentration increases from baseline to week 4, and greater decreases from baseline in clearance. CYP2B6 poor metabolizers had greater efavirenz concentrations at all weeks and greater nevirapine concentrations at baseline. None of 47 additional polymorphisms in 11 genes were significantly associated with pharmacokinetics.Among HIV-positive individuals receiving efavirenz or nevirapine, and who then initiated rifapentine plus isoniazid in A5279, NAT2 slow acetylators had greater rifapentine and 25-desacetyl rifapentine concentrations, and greater increases from baseline in plasma efavirenz and nevirapine concentrations. These associations are likely mediated by greater isoniazid exposure in NAT2 slow acetylators.
2019Association of Drug Metabolic Enzyme Genetic Polymorphisms and Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients Receiving Rifapentine and Isoniazid Therapy for Latent Tuberculosis.Int J Environ Res Public HealthWeekly rifapentine and isoniazid therapy (3HP) is the most frequent treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). However, the association between major adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug metabolic enzyme single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) remains unclear. In this study, 377 participants who received the 3HP regimen were recruited and examined for genotyping of CYP5A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2E1, and NAT2 SNPs. In our study, 184 participants (48.4%) developed ADRs. Moreover, CYP2C19 rs4986893 (TT vs. CC+CT, odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: 2.231 [1.015-4.906]), CYP2E1 rs2070676 (CC vs. CG+GG, OR [95% CI]: 1.563 [1.022-2.389]), and CYP2E1 rs2515641 (CC vs. CT+TT, OR [95% CI]: 1.903 [1.250-2.898]) were associated with ADR development. In conclusion, CYP2C19 and CYP2E1 SNPs may provide useful information regarding ADRs in LTBI patients receiving the 3HP regimen.
2000Rifapentine and isoniazid in the continuation phase of a 6-month regimen. Interim report: no activity of isoniazid in the continuation phase.Int J Tuberc Lung DisClinical trial amongst 762 patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis in Hong Kong. After an initial 2 months of a four-drug intensive phase consisting of streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide (SHRZ), a random allocation in continuation to once-weekly rifapentine + isoniazid (HRp1), HRp1 given in 2 of every 3 weeks (HRp1.2/3), or to three times weekly isoniazid + rifampicin (HR3).Interim report evaluating progress of study and the role of isoniazid in the continuation phase.Kaplan-Meier analysis and response of patients related to susceptibility of pretreatment organisms to isoniazid and to rate of isoniazid acetylation determined by NAT2 genotyping.In the 30-month follow-up, rates for adverse treatment events (failure and relapse) were 4.2% in the HR3, 10.2% in the HRp1 and 11.2% in the HRp1.2/3 series (P = 0.02 for HR3 vs HRp1 and P = 0.01 for HR3 vs HRp1.2/3). Occurrence of adverse events was not related to initial susceptibility to isoniazid nor to the rate of acetylation of isoniazid.The two rifapentine regimens had similar final rates of adverse events which were unsatisfactory. Isoniazid had little or no activity in the continuation phase, indicating that no improvement of the continuation regimen is likely to be obtained by alteration of the isoniazid dosage.