| 2002 | [Prospects for development of new antituberculous drugs]. | Kekkaku | Tuberculosis (TB) is a growing international health concern, since it is the leading infectious cause of death in the world today. Moreover, the resurgence of TB in industrialized countries and the worldwide increase in the prevalence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections in immunocompromised hosts have prompted the quest for new antimycobacterial drugs. In particular, the appearance of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of M. tuberculosis, which exhibit in vitro resistance to at least two major antituberculous drug (usually INH and RFP) and cause intractable TB, has greatly contributed to the increased incidence of TB. Because of the global health problems of TB, the increasing rate of MDR-TB and the high rate of a co-infection with HIV, the development of potent new antituberculous drugs without cross-resistance with known antimycobacterial agents is urgently needed. In this article, I reviewed the following areas. First, I briefly reviewed some new findings (mainly reported after 2000) on the pharmacological status of rifamycin derivatives (rifabutin, rifapentine, and rifalazil), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and others), and new macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin). Second, I described other types of agents which are being developed as antimycobacterial drugs. Some of the agents discussed are already under preliminary clinical investigation, and others appear to be promising candidates for future development. In this review, the status of the development of new antimycobacterial, especially antituberculous agents including oxazolidinone (PNU-100480), 5'-nitroimidazole (CGI 17341), 2-pyridone (ABT-255), new riminophenazines, nitroimidazopyran (PA-824), new ketolides (ABT-773, telithromycin) and defensins (human neutrophil peptide-I), was examined. Third, the development of new antitubercular drugs was discussed according to the potential pharmacological target. New critical information on the whole genome of M. tuberculosis recently elucidated and increasing knowledge on various mycobacterial virulence genes will promote the progression in the identification of genes that code for new drug targets. Using such findings on mycobacterial genomes, drug development using quantitative structure-activity relationship may be possible in the near future. In this review, I described the screening of drugs that have an inhibitory activity against dTDP-rhamnose synthesis of M. tuberculosis, as a new drug target of the organism. In addition, I discussed the usefulness of antisense oligo DNAs specific to mycobacterial genes encoding certain metabolic enzymes or virulence factors that play roles in the bacterial escape from antimicrobial mechanisms of host macrophages. Fourth, I reviewed the drug vehicles which enable efficacious drug delivery to their target in vivo. The usefulness of poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microsphere technology, which enables the encapsulated drugs to deliver the requested doses of them for prolonged time periods by a single shot without causing any toxicity and, moreover, enables the highly targeted delivery of the drugs to host macrophages, was discussed. Fifth, I described adjunctive immunotherapy for the management of patients with mycobacterial infections by giving certain immunomodulators in combination with antimycobacterial drugs. Adjuvant clinical trials using IL-2 or GM-CSF have been found to be efficacious to some extent in improving patients with tuberculosis or disseminated MAC infections. However, it seems that these immunopotentiating cytokines as well as IFN-gamma and IL-12 are not so promising for the therapeutic agents of mycobacterial infections because of the possible induction of immunosuppressive cytokines during adjuvant therapy and, in some cases, severe side-effect. Thus, the development of new classes of immuno-modulators other than cytokines, particularly those with no severe side-effect, is needed. This review dealt with ATP and its analogues which potentiate macrophage antimycobacterial activity via a purinergic P2X7 receptor. Finally, I described the roles of type II alveolar epithelial cells in the establishment of mycobacterial infections in the host lungs and the profiles of drug susceptibilities of M. tuberculosis and MAC organisms replicating within the type II pneumocytes. These findings are useful to precisely assess or predict the in vivo therapeutic activity of a given antimycobacterial drug from its in vitro activity. In this article, I have thoroughly reviewed the status of the development of new antimycobacterial drugs. There are a number of difficulties in the drug-design for the development of new drug formulations with increased potential for antimycobacterial effects, excellent pharmacokinetics, and tolerability. It should be emphasized that the most urgent goal of chemotherapy of tuberculosis and MAC infections, especially that associated with HIV infection, is to develop highly active, low-cost drugs which can be used not only in industrialized countries but also in developing countries, since the incidences of AIDS-associated intractable tuberculosis is rapidly increasing in the latter. |
| 2000 | Prospects for development of new antimycobacterial drugs. | J Infect Chemother | In this article, I have thoroughly reviewed the status of development of new antimycobacterial drugs, particularly fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, sitafloxacin, and moxifloxacin), new macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin), rifamycin derivatives (rifabutin, rifapentine, and KRM-1648), and others. The main purpose of this review was to describe the in-vitro and in-vivo activities of these drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex. In addition, the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs in the clinical treatment of mycobacterial infections has also been briefly mentioned. |
| 2000 | Prospects for development of new antimycobacterial drugs, with special reference to a new benzoxazinorifamycin, KRM-1648. | Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) | In this article, I have thoroughly reviewed the status of development of new antimycobacterial drugs, in particular, rifamycin derivatives (rifabutin, rifapentine, and a new benzoxazinorifamycin, KRM-1648), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and others), new macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin, roxithromycin), and others. In this review, I have mainly described the in vitro and in vivo activities of these drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and atypical mycobacteria, especially Mycobacterium avium complex. In addition, therapeutic efficacy of these drugs in cases of clinical treatment of mycobacterial infections have also been briefly mentioned. |
| 1998 | [Nontuberculous mycobacteriosis; the present status and in the future. 3--(1). The view of development of new drugs against nontuberculous mycobacterial infections]. | Kekkaku | It is obvious that the number of patients with pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infections is increasing gradually in Japan. Of these infections, M. avium complex (MAC) is the most common cause, and is known to be resistant to many antimicrobial drugs. At present, no standard regimen which is able to control MAC infections completely is established. For these reasons, the development of new drugs with strong antimycobacterial activity which are not cross-resistant to conventional antimycobacterial drugs is urgently desired. Thus, we studied in vitro activities of various drugs which are expected to be a new promising drug against nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and reviewed clinical impact of these drugs. 1) New quinolones New quinolones including ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and Sparfloxacin (SPFX), are considered to be active against M. tuberculosis, M. kansasii, M. fortuitum, but are inactive against MAC, M. chelonae, M. abscessus, M. scrofulaceum. Both AM-1155 and Du-6859a, newer quinolones, seemed to be comparable to or more active than SPFX which is considered to be most active now. 2) New macrolides Clarithromycin (CAM) has in vitro activities against various nontuberculous mycobacteria including MAC, and also has proven to have clinical potential not only for disseminated MAC infections in AIDS but also for pulmonary MAC infections. Therefore, CAM seems to be a candidate for one of the key drugs in the treatment of MAC infections. 3)Rifamycins Rifabutin (RBT) and rifapentine exhibited more potent in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activities than rifampicin. RBT has already demonstrated clinical effect against intractable tuberculosis and MAC infections. Thus, RBT is recommended for the prophylaxis of M. tuberculosis and MAC infections in AIDS patients in US. KRM-1648 displayed much more potent in vitro and in vivo activities than rifampicin against both M. tuberculosis and MAC. It is needed an effort to confirm its therapeutic efficacies. Now clinical phase study is going on in US. 4) Phenazines Clofazimine (CFZ), an effective antileprosy drug, is known to be active in vitro against various mycobacteria including MAC, and often used as a component of combination chemotherapy for disseminated MAC infections in AIDS patients in US. Recently, CFZ new analogs have been developed, and it is necessary to evaluate its activities against nontuberculous mycobacteria. |
| 1995 | New drugs for tuberculosis. | Eur Respir J Suppl | Since the late 1960s, tuberculosis has been successfully cured with antibiotics. With the introduction of rifampin, "short course" regimens using isoniazid and rifampin together with either streptomycin, ethambutol or pyrazinamide, for 6-9 months, have been successfully adopted. The spread of drug resistant M. tuberculosis strains in large urban areas has made this armamentarium of drugs insufficient, calling for the development of new drugs. Among rifamycin derivatives, rifabutin is more active than rifampin in vitro and in experimental animals, and allows sputum conversion rats of 95-100%. It is effective in treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Rifapentine is more active than rifampin in vitro and has a longer half-life, but it is not active against rifampin-resistant strains. Fluoroquinolones concentrate within macrophages, are effective against M. tuberculosis and act synergistically with rifampin and isoniazid. Ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, Sparfloxacin and lomefloxacin have been evaluated as antimycobacterial agents, and no cross-resistance with major antituberculous drugs has been found. Several other drugs, including new inhibitors of beta-lactamase and new beta-lactamase-resistant antibiotics, the aminoglycoside antibiotic, paromomycin, and the new nitroimidazole, 2-ethyl-5-intro-2.3-dihydro imidazo-oxazole, have been found to be active in vitro against M. tuberculosis. |
| 1991 | Activities of sparfloxacin, azithromycin, temafloxacin, and rifapentine compared with that of clarithromycin against multiplication of Mycobacterium avium complex within human macrophages. | Antimicrob Agents Chemother | The activities of Sparfloxacin, azithromycin, temafloxacin, and rifapentine against two virulent strains of the Mycobacterium avium complex isolated from patients with AIDS were evaluated in a model of intracellular infection and were compared with that of clarithromycin. Human monocyte-derived macrophages were infected with the M. avium complex at day 6 of culture. The intracellular CFU was counted 60 min after inoculation. The intracellular and supernatant CFU was counted on days 4 and 7 after inoculation. The concentrations used, which were equal to peak levels in serum, were 10 micrograms of rifapentine per ml (MICs for the two strains, 4 and 16 micrograms/ml), 4 micrograms of clarithromycin per ml (MICs, 8 and 4 micrograms/ml), 1 microgram of azithromycin per ml (MICs, 32 and 16 micrograms/ml), 4 micrograms of temafloxacin per ml (MICs, 2 and 16 micrograms/ml), and 1 microgram of Sparfloxacin per ml (MICs, 0.5 and 2 micrograms/ml). Compared with controls on day 7 after inoculation, clarithromycin (P less than 0.001), Sparfloxacin (P less than 0.001), and azithromycin (P less than 0.001 for the first strain, P less than 0.02 for the second) slowed intracellular replication. Rifapentine (P less than 0.001) and temafloxacin (P less than 0.001) slowed intracellular replication of the first strain but not of the second strain. Azithromycin plus Sparfloxacin was as effective as Sparfloxacin alone. In this macrophage model, Sparfloxacin or clarithromycin (difference not significant) exhibited a better efficacy than rifapentine, azithromycin, or temafloxacin against intracellular M. avium complex infection. |