| 1998 | Susceptibilities of Legionella spp. to newer antimicrobials in vitro. | Antimicrob Agents Chemother | The in vitro activities of 13 antimicrobial agents against 30 strains of Legionella spp. were determined. Rifapentine, rifampin, and clarithromycin were the most potent agents (MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited [MIC90s], < or = 0.008 microgram/ml). The ketolide HMR 3647 and the fluoroquinolones levofloxacin and BAY 12-8039 (MIC90s, 0.03 to 0.06 microgram/ml) were more active than Erythromycin A or roxithromycin. The MIC90s of dalfopristin-quinupristin and linezolid were 0.5 and 8 micrograms/ml, respectively. Based on class characteristics and in vitro activities, several of these agents may have potential roles in the treatment of Legionella infections. |
| 1998 | In vitro susceptibilities of aerobic and facultative non-spore-forming gram-positive bacilli to HMR 3647 (RU 66647) and 14 other antimicrobials. | Antimicrob Agents Chemother | The comparative in vitro activity of the ketolide HMR 3647 (RU 66647) and those of structurally related macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin compounds (Erythromycin, roxithromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, josamycin, lincomycin, pristinamycin, and quinupristin-dalfopristin) as well as those of benzylpenicillin, doxycycline, vancomycin, teicoplanin, levofloxacin, and rifapentine against 247 aerobic and facultative non-spore-forming gram-positive bacilli were determined by an agar dilution method. The ketolide was active against most organisms tested except Corynebacterium striatum, coryneform CDC group 12, and Oerskovia spp. The frequency of resistance to Erythromycin and other macrolides as well as that to lincomycin was high. Pristinamycin and, to a lesser extent, quinupristin-dalfopristin were very active, but resistance to these agents was present in some strains of Rhodococcus equi, Listeria spp., C. striatum, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, and Oerskovia spp. HMR 3647 was very active against all Erythromycin-sensitive and many Erythromycin-nonsusceptible strains, especially Corynebacterium minutissimum, Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, Corynebacterium amycolatum, and Corynebacterium jeikeium. In vitro resistance to benzylpenicillin was common, but doxycycline, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were very active against most organisms tested except E. rhusiopathiae, against which glycopeptide antibiotics were not active. The in vitro activity of levofloxacin was remarkable, but resistance to this agent was common for C. amycolatum, Corynebacterium urealyticum, C. jeikeium, and Oerskovia spp. strains. Rifapentine was also very active in vitro against many organisms, but resistance to this agent was always present in E. rhusiopathiae and was very common in C. striatum and C. urealyticum. |
| 1998 | In vitro susceptibilities of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis to two ketolides (HMR 3004 and HMR 3647), four macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, and roxithromycin), and two ansamycins (rifampin and rifapentine). | Antimicrob Agents Chemother | When tested by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood, the ketolides HMR 3004 and HMR 3647 were slightly more active (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited [MIC90], 0.03 microg/ml) against Bordetella pertussis than azithromycin, clarithromycin, Erythromycin A, and roxithromycin. Azithromycin (MIC90, 0.06 microg/ml) was the most active compound against B. parapertussis. Rifampin and rifapentine were considerably less active. |
| 1994 | Antimycobacterial drugs. | Semin Respir Infect | This review consists of the following three sections: (1) General principles in selecting antimycobacterial drugs for the treatment regimens, (2) The antimicrobial activity in vitro with an emphasis on inhibitory and bactericidal potency of various agents, and (3) Drug susceptibility testing including methodology and interpretation of the test results. Each of these sections addresses three groups of antimycobacterial agents: (1) against tuberculosis, (2) against Mycobacterium avium complex infections, and (3) against infections caused by M. fortuitum and M chelonae. The following are the drugs examined in the sections and subsections of this review: isoniazid, ethionamide, thiacetazone, rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, KRM-1648, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, kanamycin, amikacin, capreomycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ethambutol, para-aminosalicylic acid, D-cycloserine, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloin, clofazimine, clarithromycin, azithromycin, Erythromycin, cefoxitin, cefmetazole, imipenem, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, trimethoprim, and doxycycline. |
| 1993 | In vitro activities of new macrolides and rifapentine against Brucella spp. | Antimicrob Agents Chemother | We have tested the in vitro activities of streptomycin, rifampin, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, Erythromycin, four new macrolides (roxithromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and dirithromycin), and rifapentine against 62 strains of Brucella spp. Azithromycin and clarithromycin were, respectively, eight- and twofold more active than Erythromycins (MIC for 90% of strains = 2, 8, and 16 micrograms/ml, respectively). The activity of rifapentine was similar to that of rifampin (MIC for 90% of strains = 1 microgram/ml). |
| 1991 | Effect of various antibiotics on Listeria monocytogenes multiplying in L 929 cells. | Infection | Various antibiotics were evaluated as to their effect on Listeria monocytogenes SLCC 4013 multiplying within L 929 mouse fibroblast cells. Antibiotics were employed in concentrations above the MIC value. However, there was no measurable effect of some drugs on intracellular listeriae (azlocillin, mezlocillin, cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol). With other drugs an inhibition of intracellular growth was observed (penicillin, ampicillin, rifampicin, rifapentine, Erythromycin, doxycycline, co-trimoxazole, coumermycin). Notably, with none of the antibiotics a complete eradication of the listeriae was achieved. There is a good correlation of these results with animal experiments. Therefore, the cell culture system might be useful for the screening of new antibiotics. |
| 1987 | Comparative in vitro activity of CI934, a new fluoroquinolone, alone and in combination with coumermycin, against gram-positive bacteria. | Drugs Exp Clin Res | The in vitro activity of Cl934, a new quinolone antimicrobial agent, was studied against 314 strains of Gram-positive bacteria representing 6 genera: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis, S. agalactiae, S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, S. milleri, viridans streptococci, Listeria monocytogenes, Corynebacterium JK, Mycobacterium fortuitum and Bacillus spp.; and compared with that of enoxacin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin G, ampicillin, coumermycin, oxacillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, rifampin, rifapentine, LM 427, Erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline and clindamycin. The agar dilution method was used. Cl934 was very active in vitro, with MIC90 less than or equal to 0.5 mg/l against most species tested, except for S. faecalis and M. fortuitum. It was usually 2 to 8-fold more active than ciprofloxacin. Cl934 was also tested by the killing curve method, alone and in combination with coumermycin. It was rapidly bactericidal against most species tested, including S. faecalis. A synergistic interaction was observed with coumermycin against S. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. milleri and S. faecalis. The only antagonistic interaction occurred against L. monocytogenes exposed to 8 X MIC of Cl934 with 2 X MIC of coumermycin. |
| 1985 | In vitro activities of rifapentine and rifampin, alone and in combination with six other antibiotics, against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant staphylococci of different species. | Antimicrob Agents Chemother | The antistaphylococcal activity of rifapentine, a new rifamycin SV derivative, was evaluated in vitro and compared with that of rifampin. A total of 313 staphylococcal strains freshly isolated from clinical material and including representatives of all currently recognized Staphylococcus species of human origin were used. The susceptibility to methicillin of all the test strains was determined preliminarily. Despite minor differences with some species, the MICs of rifapentine were found to be substantially similar to those of rifampin. Methicillin-resistant strains of all species were most resistant to rifapentine and rifampin than were their methicillin-susceptible counterparts. For most strains tested, the MBCs of both rifamycins exceeded by twofold the respective MICs. Both the checkerboard dilution and time-kill methods were used to determine the interactions of rifapentine or rifampin with six different antibiotics: cefamandole, vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin, Erythromycin, and fusidic acid. No significant differences between the two rifamycins in the combinations were observed against either methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant strains. Minor differences were noted depending on the second antibiotic tested or the staphylococcal species examined. Antagonism was never observed, and indifference was the prevalent response. Cases of synergism were observed occasionally with the checkerboard method and slightly more often with the time-kill method. |